DATA PRESENTATION:
Research MethodsDATA PRESENTATION
Tables and graphs (pictorial presentation of data) may simplify and clarify the research data. Tabular and graphic representation of data may take a number of forms, ranging from computer printouts to elaborate pictographs. The purpose of each table or graph, however, is to facilitate the summarization and communication of the meaning of the data.
Although there are a number of standardized forms for presenting data in table or graphs, the creative researcher can increase the effectiveness of particular presentation. Bar charts, pie charts, curve diagrams, pictograms, and other graphic forms of presentation create a strong visual impression.
The proliferation of computer technology in business and universities has greatly facilitated tabulation and statistical analysis. Commercial packages eliminate the need to write a new program every time you want to tabulate and analyze data with a computer. SAS, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), SYSTAT, Epi. Info. And MINITAB is commonly used statistical packages. These user friendly packages emphasize statistical calculations and hypothesis testing for varied types of data. They also provide programs for entering and editing data. Most of these packages contain sizeable arrays of programs for descriptive analysis and univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistical analysis.
Results with one variable
Frequency Distribution
Several useful techniques for displaying data are in use. The easiest way to describe the numerical data of one variable is with a frequency distribution. It can be used with nominal-, ordinal-, interval-, or ratio-level data and takes many forms. For example we have data of 400 students. We can summarize the data on the gender of the students at a glance with raw count or a frequency distribution
Table 1: Frequency distribution of students
Gender | Frequency | Percent |
Male Female | 300 100 | 75 25 |
Total | 400 | 100 |
We can present the same information in a graphic form. Some common types of graphic presentations are the histograms, bar chart, and pie chart. Bar charts or graphs are used for discrete variables. They can have vertical or horizontal orientation with small space between the bars. The terminology is not exact, but histograms are usually upright bar graphs for interval or ratio data.
Presentation of data in these forms lays emphasis on visual representation and graphical techniques over summary statistics. Summary statistics may obscure, conceal, or even misrepresent the underlying structure of the data. Therefore it is suggested that data analysis should begin with visual inspection.
The presented data has to be interpreted. The purpose of interpretation is to explain the meanings of the data so that we can make inferences and formulate conclusions. Therefore, interpretation refers to making inferences pertinent to the meaning and implications of the research investigation and drawing conclusions. In order for interpretation, the data have to be meaningfully analyzed. For purposes of analysis the researchers use statistics.
The word statistics has several meanings. It can mean a set of collected numbers (e.g. numbers telling how many people living in a city) as well as a branch of applied mathematics used to manipulate and summarize the features of numbers. Social researchers use both types of statistics. Here, we focus on the second type – ways to manipulate and summarize numbers that represent data from research project.
Descriptive statistics describe numerical data. They can be categorized by the number of variables involved: univariate, bivariate, or multivariate (for one, two, and three or more variables). Univariate statistics describe one variable.
Researchers often want to summarize the information about one variable into a single number. They use three measures of central tendency, or measures of the center of the frequency distribution: mean, median and mode, which are often called averages (a less precise and less clear way to say the same thing). The mode is simply the most common or frequently occurring number. The median is the middle point. The mean also called the arithmetic average, is the most widely used measure of central tendency. A particular central tendency is used depending upon the nature of the data.
Bivariate Tables
The bivariate contingency table is widely used. The table is based on cross-tabulation (crossclassification); that is the cases are organized in the table on the basis of two variables at the same time.
A contingency table is formed by cross-tabulating the two or more variables. It is contingent because the cases in each category of a variable get distributed into each category of a second variable. The table distributes cases into categories of multiple variables at the same time and shows how the cases, by the category of one variable, are “contingent upon” the categories of the other variables.
Constructing Percentage Tables
It is to construct a percentage table, but there are ways to make it look professional. Let us take two variables like the age of the respondents and their attitude towards “women empowerment.” Assuming that age affects the attitude towards women empowerment let us hypothesize: the lower the age, the higher the favorable attitude towards “women empowerment.” The age range of the respondents is 25 to 70, and the attitude index has three categories of “highly favorable,” “medium favorable,” and “low favorable.” The age variable has so many categories that making a table with that number becomes unwieldy and meaningless. Therefore, we regroup (recode) the age categories into three i.e. under 40 years, 40 – 60 years, and 61 + years.
Univariate table for age
- Table 2: Age of the respondents .
- Age (Yrs.) Frequency Percent .
- Under 40 1000 33.3
- 40 – 60 1000 33.3
- 61 + 1000 33.3 .
- Total 3000 100 .
Univariate table for attitude
• Table 3: Attitude towards women
. | empowerment | . | ||||
Attitude | Frequency | Percent | ||||
Hi Favorable | 1100 | 37 | ||||
Med Favorable | 1050 | 35 | ||||
Lo Favorable | 850 | 28 | ||||
Total 3000 100
Bivariate table
• Table 4: Age by attitude towards women
. | empowerment | . | |||
Age (in years) | . | ||||
Level of | under 40 | 40 –60 | 61 + | Total | |
attitude | F. | % | F. | % | F | % | F | % | ||
Hi Favorable | 600 | 60 | 300 | 30 | 200 | 20 | 1100 | 37 | ||
Med. Favorable 300 | 30 | 500 | 50 | 250 | 25 | 1050 | 35 | |||
Lo Favorable | 100 | 10 | 200 | 20 | 500 | 50 | 850 | 28 | ||
Total | 1000 | 100 | 1000 | 100 | 1000 | 100 | 3000 | 100 | ||
Recent Comments