REVIEW OF PART-II
Group Two or more freely interacting people with shared norms and goals and a
common identity
Formal group Formed by the organization
Informal group Formed by friends or those with common interests.
Group Cohesiveness A “we feeling” binding group members together
Roles Expected behaviors for a given position.
Role overload Others’ expectations exceed one’s ability
Role conflict Others have conflicting or inconsistent expectations
Role ambiguity Others’ expectations are unknown
Norm Shared attitudes, opinions, feelings, or actions that guide social behavior
Task roles Task-oriented group behavior.
Maintenance roles Relationship-building group behavior
Groupthink Janis’s term for a cohesive in-group’s unwillingness to realistically view
alternatives
Social loafing Decrease in individual effort as group size increases.
Team Small group with complementary skills who hold themselves mutually
accountable for common purpose, goals, and approach
Team viability Team members satisfied and willing to contribute
Trust Reciprocal faith in others’ intentions and behavior
Propensity to trust A personality trait involving one’s general willingness to trust others
Cohesiveness A sense of “wane” helps group stick together.
Socio-emotional
cohesiveness Sense of togetherness based on emotional satisfaction.
Instrumental
cohesiveness Sense of togetherness based on mutual dependency needed to get the job done
Quality circles Small groups of volunteers who strive to solve quality-related problems.
Virtual team Information technology allows group members in different locations to conduct
business.

Self-managed teams Groups of employees granted administrative oversight for their work. Cross-functionalism Team made up of technical specialists from different areas. Team building Experiential learning aimed at better internal functioning of groups. Self-management

leadership Process of leading others to lead themselves. Communication Interpersonal exchange of information and understanding Perceptual model of communication Process in which receivers create their own meaning. Noise Interference with the transmission and understanding of a message Communication competence Ability to effectively use communication behaviors in a given context. Assertive style Expressive and self enhancing, but does not take advantage of others. Aggressive style Expressive and self enhancing, but takes unfair advantage of others. Nonassertive style Timid and self denying behavior. Nonverbalcommunication Messages sent outside of the written or spoken word. Listening Actively decoding and interpreting verbal messages. Linguistic style A person’s typical speaking pattern. Gender-flex Temporarily using communication behaviors typical of the other gender. Formal communication channels Follow the chain or command or organizational structure. Informal communication channels Do not follow the chain of command or organizational structure.

Liaison individuals Those who consistently pass along grapevine information to others Organizational moles Those who use the grapevine to enhance their power and status Information richness Information-carrying capacity of data

Purposeful communication distortion Purposely modifying the content of a message. Internet A global network of computer networks

Intranet An organization’s private Internet.
Extranet Connects internal employees with selected customers, suppliers, and strategic
partners
Electronic mail Uses the Internet/intranet to send computer-generated text and documents.
Group support
systems Using computer software and hardware to help people work better together.
Telecommuting Doing work that is generally performed in the office away from the office using
different information technologies
Leadership Process whereby an individual influences others to achieve a common goal.
Leader trait Personal characteristics that differentiate leaders from followers
Consideration Creating mutual respect and trust with followers.
Initiating structure Organizing and defining what group members should be doing.
Situational theories Propose that leader styles should match the situation at hand.
Leader-member
relations Extent that leader has the support, loyalty, and trust of work group.
Task structure Amount of structure contained within work tasks.
Position power Degree to which leader has formal power
Contingency factors Variables that influence the appropriateness of a leadership style.
Transactional
leadership Focuses on clarifying employees’ roles and providing rewards contingent on
performance
Transformational
leadership Transforms employees to pursue organizational goals over self-interests.
Shared leadership Simultaneous, ongoing, mutual influence process in which people share
responsibility for leading
Social power Ability to get things done with human, informational, and material resources
Socialized power Directed at helping others
Personalized power Directed at helping oneself
Reward power Obtaining compliance with promised or actual rewards
Coercive power Obtaining compliance through threatened or actual punishment
Legitimate power Obtaining compliance through formal authority
Expert power Obtaining compliance through one’s knowledge or information

Referent power Obtaining compliance through charisma or personal attraction

Empowerment Sharing varying degrees of power with lower-level employees to tap their full potential

Participative management Involving employees in various forms of decision making Delegation Granting decision making authority to people at lower levels

Personal initiative Going beyond formal job requirements and being an active self-starter Organizational politics Intentional enhancement of self-interest

Coalition Temporary groupings of people who actively pursue a single issue

Impression management Getting others to see us in a certain manner Conflict One party perceives its interests are being opposed or set back by another party Functional conflict Serves organization’s interests Dysfunctional

conflict Threatens organization’s interests Personality conflict Interpersonal opposition driven by personal dislike or disagreement Programmed conflict Encourages different opinions without protecting management’s personal

feelings Devil’s advocacy Assigning someone the role of critic Dialectic method Fostering a debate of opposing viewpoints to better understand an issue Conflict triangle Conflicting parties involve a third person rather than dealing directly with each

other. Negotiation Give-and-take process between conflicting interdependent parties

VN:F [1.9.10_1130]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.10_1130]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)